Success Stories

ASME Had the Brand and the Reach.

We Helped Build the Strategy.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers

A powerhouse of credentials waiting for one strategy to unite them.

ASME had everything that matters: a nearly 150-year reputation as a trusted standards authority, credentials spanning an engineer’s entire career, and hundreds of digital badges already issued. The pieces were strong. What they needed was a single strategy to make them add up to more than the sum of their parts.

MCM delivered a Credentialing Clarity and Alignment Strategy that unified ASME’s credentials under one taxonomy, governance model, and roadmap — moving the organization from exploration to implementation readiness, and positioning it to lead skills-based recognition in engineering.

The Opportunity in Numbers

Real scale, ready to become shareable evidence.

ASME was already issuing credentials. MCM helped give that momentum a shared taxonomy, metadata framework, and unified strategy that makes credentials clearer, more consistent, and more useful to learners, employers, and verifiers.

500 +

Digital badges already in market

6

Credential types unified under one taxonomy

12

Verifiable Metadata components mapped

13

Rigorous Industry-aligned Learning Pathways

Why the metadata matters

The strategy connects ASME’s credentials and earning pathways to richer records — helping key stakeholders signal and understand what was earned, how it was assessed, what evidence supports it, and why it matters.

Skills Evidence Assessment Pathways

Deliverable Highlight

One ecosystem under a shared taxonomy.

MCM helped ASME create a practical organizational credential classification system that makes it easier for ASME's global team to determine what kind of recognition is being issued, how strong the signal should be, what outside recognizers (such as employers) need to see, and what evidence is required to support the claim.

Classification logic

Three questions guide the credential type.

01

Is there an assessment?

02

Does it support an external certification?

03

What is being evaluated?

Credential Signal Strength

Credential value becomes stronger as assessment, evidence, and validation increase.

1 Low Rigor

Participation

Recognizes attendance or engagement.

Examples: webinars, events, workshops
2A Low Rigor

Knowledge

Recognizes understanding of concepts.

Examples: quizzes, module tests
2B Medium Rigor

Competency

Recognizes applied skill or performance.

Examples: capstones, performance tasks
3 Medium Rigor

Service

Recognizes contribution to ASME.

Examples: committee roles, volunteer service
4 High Rigor

Innovation

Recognizes judged engineering work.

Examples: ISHOW, E-Fest
5 High Rigor

Nomination

Recognizes selected excellence.

Examples: scholarships, design awards
6 Highest Rigor

Industry-Recognized

Recognizes validated industry skill.

Examples: personnel certifications, QRO

Why it matters

The taxonomy gives ASME a shared way to classify credentials, explain their value, and match each credential to the right level of evidence, assessment, and metadata.

What we built together

A complete, evidence-based strategy

MCM delivered a unified strategy grounded in prioritization, governance, standards-aligned metadata, and a clear path to external validation.

The work gave ASME a practical path from exploration to implementation — connecting strong existing assets to a clearer, more scalable credential strategy.

Prioritization

Opportunity became focus.

MCM scored ecosystem opportunities across impact and feasibility, helping ASME separate strategic bets from quick wins and supportive efforts.

Standards + Metadata

Built on the specifications the field already trusts.

The framework is encoded to Open Badges 3.0 and the Comprehensive Learner Record Standard from 1EdTech — the same specifications AACRAO has adopted for digital learner records — so ASME's credentials are cryptographically verifiable and interoperable with the broader credentialing ecosystem.

Market Positioning

Built for ASME's scale, not anyone else's.

With more than 72,000 members in over 130 countries, ASME doesn't need to follow someone else's credentialing model. The strategy was built around ASME's own reach, standards authority, and engineer-career arc — designed to scale on its own terms.

Validation Readiness

ASME was positioned for stronger external validation.

The strategy clarified how ASME credentials could be structured for stronger external recognition, including ABET alignment considerations.

The Strategic Shift

From credential activity to unified infrastructure that scales.

ASME already had strong programs, respected credentials, digital badges, and global reach. The strategy gave those assets a shared structure — so recognition could be governed, encoded, validated, and scaled with confidence.

Before

Strong credential activity

  • Trusted programs
  • Existing digital badges
  • Global engineering audience
  • Recognized ASME brand

After

Shared credential infrastructure

  • Common taxonomy
  • Governance model
  • Standards-aligned metadata
  • Validation pathway
01

Shared language

A common way to describe credential types, recognition levels, and signal strength across teams.

02

Shared rules

Governance for how credentials are classified, reviewed, approved, maintained, and explained.

03

Shared data model

Standards-aligned metadata that makes each credential clearer, more portable, and easier to trust.

04

Shared validation path

A stronger foundation for external recognition, including ABET alignment considerations.

Why it matters

When credential activity becomes infrastructure, new credentials do not have to be invented from scratch. Teams have a shared way to decide what something is, what it proves, what metadata it needs, and how it can carry value beyond the issuing moment.

What This Unlocks

More value for every audience that touches the credential.

The strategy helps ASME credentials carry clearer meaning beyond the moment they are issued — so learners, employers, internal teams, and partners can each read the credential with greater confidence.

Learners

Turn achievement into a clearer professional story.

Engineers can better understand what they earned, what it represents, and how it fits into a larger career pathway.

Portable evidence

Employers

Make the credential signal easier to interpret.

Employers and verifiers can distinguish participation, knowledge, competency, service, innovation, and industry-recognized credentials without guessing.

Readable signal

ASME teams

Give teams a repeatable way to design and scale.

Program teams have a shared framework for classifying, reviewing, explaining, and maintaining credentials across offerings.

Operational consistency

Partners

Connect ASME credentials to broader skills-based ecosystems.

Alignment with open standards sets the stage for direct and indirect collaboration with state, regional, and national LER initiatives as they shift toward skills-based learning and employment records.

Open standards

Structure and Scale

A repeatable operating model for credential value.

The strategy did more than sort badges into categories. It gave ASME a shared way to move every credential from idea to approval to ongoing maintenance — so each badge can carry the consistency, evidence, and trust ASME needs to scale.

The operating model

Every credential follows the same governance logic.

Whether a badge recognizes participation, knowledge, competency, service, innovation, nomination, or an industry-recognized credential, the model creates a consistent path for defining what it means and how it should be governed.

01

Identify

Clarify the opportunity, audience, and purpose of recognition.

02

Classify

Apply the taxonomy to determine the credential type and signal strength.

03

Design

Define criteria, evidence, metadata, skills, and pathway relationships.

04

Approve

Use shared governance to review quality, consistency, and strategic fit.

05

Maintain

Monitor adoption, relevance, renewal needs, and ecosystem value.

Structure

Shared taxonomy and definitions

Governance

Consistent review and approval

Evidence

Clear criteria and support

Scale

Repeatable process across programs

This is what turns individual digital badges into an ASME credential ecosystem: the same structure, governance, and quality logic applied across every category of recognition.

Work with MCM

Build credentials that carry value beyond the badge.

Micro-credential Multiverse helps organizations move from disconnected credential activity to durable credential ecosystems — grounded in strategy, governance, standards, evidence, and real market value.

Built for organizations that need to

01

Align credentials to skills, standards, and stakeholder value.

02

Create governance and approval processes that can scale.

03

Define metadata, evidence, and assessment expectations.

04

Build credential systems that are vendor-neutral and future-ready.

Vendor-neutral Standards-aligned Built to last